Bountiful city policy

Everyone has different taste, and they have right to choose things what they like. When i read this article 'Bountiful city policy', I thought this is unfair to restrict hiring of people with tattoos first, because the people who have tattoo or piercing are the same as any other people. They are just same people but just have tattoos in their body. Whatever the reason they have tattoos, they are same as other people and tattoo is just visual things.

This is just what I thought in their right, however, I agree with this bountiful city's policy. Whenever I see the people who have tattoos, I feel like scary and avoid them. I mean not the small and cute tattoo; the people who have tattoos that cover their body. It can give others an unpleasant feeling, especially when they are employees. It is hard to come up first. Honestly, people who have tattoos looks some kind of scary to me, and I think some other people think like me. If you have to choose one person among two people for your business, one has a tattoo on his whole arm; who do you want to choose? I fell more comfortable with the person who does not have tattoo. It is just my prejudiced, but some people think like me, to. To restrict hiring people with tattoos is to the bountiful city advantage to do so. Thus, I think this policy is fair to their city if the bountiful city want to present professional image.